Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quote

ENVIRONMENT: Greenhouse gases hit record high

gases.jpg

Posted 25/11/2019

Despite the promises of the Paris Agreement greenhouse gas levels have reached record highs warned The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) on Monday, November 25, just a week before the Climate Summit in Madrid.

In its annual report on the concentration of the gases, the UN-dependent body indicated that the global average concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main gas causing the greenhouse effect reached 407.8 parts per million in 2018 .056% more than in 2017.

This implies a concentration equivalent to 147% of that registered at pre-industrial levels (of 1750), and an annual increase above the average of the last 10 years, according to the observations of the Global Atmosphere Surveillance Network, which has stations in the Arctic, mountainous areas and tropical islands.

WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas recalled at the press conference presenting the report that CO2 can remain centuries in the atmosphere, and even more in the oceans so that its concentrations are one of the most serious problems.

He said that the last time such high concentrations of CO2 occurred was between three and five million years ago, and then the temperature was two to three degrees warmer and the sea level between 10 and 20 meters higher than the current one.

 

https://www.newsroompanama.com/environment/environment-greenhouse-gases-hit-record-high

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, The Cutting Edge said:

And the hole in the ozone layer has never been so small in recorded history.

Is there reliable, factual data which reinforces that statement ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Moderator_02 said:

He said that the last time such high concentrations of CO2 occurred was between three and five million years ago,

So, that means it's not really a record high.  But this sounds scary, so CO2 must make up 20% of the atmosphere now, and skyrocketing!

Naw, it's less than that. In fact, it's still less than 0.04%.  Not 4%, not 4/10ths of 1%.  Less than 4/100ths of 1%. 

So, even though the level is 147% higher than it was in 1750, it is a very tiny increase in a very tiny number.  

I'm not trying to start a climate debate here.  All I am suggesting is that a lot of information lacks any perspective for the casual reader.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAYBE, they took the samples in the mountains of Tennessee and compared them to L.A. lololololololol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...